Speaker
Abstract
Most engineering teams are stuck treating AI as autocomplete. Engineers have GitHub Copilot installed (or Claude or Cursor or whatever), they're generating snippets faster, but leaders can't connect usage to business outcomes—and developers are shipping code they don't fully understand. The problem isn't the tools. It's the absence of intentional training.
This talk presents a structured, measurable approach to transform your engineers from "coders with copilots" into AI-native orchestrators who amplify their critical thinking rather than erode it. Drawing from a three-month training pilot launching at a global streaming platform you'll see a bi-weekly cadence of concrete activities designed using proven change management principles that shift AI usage across the full software delivery lifecycle.
What You'll Learn
- Why training isn't optional: The hidden cost of ad-hoc AI adoption—skill erosion, "vibe coding" at scale, and unmeasured experimentation that leadership can't justify
- A change framework that works: How to address vision, skills, incentives, resources, and action plans together using the Lippitt-Knoster model to avoid the confusion and resistance that plague most AI rollouts
- Practical activities you can run Monday: Context engineering exercises, agent-assisted design reviews, pair programming with AI, voice-based prompting experiments, and deliberate "no AI" days that surface where tools help versus where they mask gaps
- Metrics that matter to leadership: How to tag and track AI-assisted work in GitHub, measure PR cycle time and remediation rates, and capture developer confidence through lightweight surveys that reveal ROI
This session is designed for engineering leaders, staff engineers, and managers who need to move beyond "let's see what happens" and build a deliberate training program that turns AI adoption into a competitive advantage. You'll leave with a concrete three-month roadmap—including week-by-week activities, measurement frameworks, and implementation tactics—that you can adapt to your organization starting next sprint.
The core message:
If you want your entire organization to use AI efficiently, training isn't a nice-to-have. It's the difference between amplifying your team's capabilities and scaling technical debt.
Topics
QCon London 2026 is a three day conference for senior software engineers, architects and team leads. An international program committee of working engineers selects every session. Patterns and practices, not products and pitches.
Part of the track
Building Engineering Teams Hosted by Wes Reisz Technical Principal @Thoughtworks, 16-Time QCon Chair, & Creator of The InfoQ PodcastFrom the same track
Tuesday 17 March
10:35 Churchill (Ground Fl.) Session organization Team Topologies as the 'Infrastructure for Agency' with AI Matthew Skelton CEO & Principal @Conflux, Co-Author of "Team Topologies", Leader in Modern Organizational Dynamics for Fast Flow The book Team Topologies Second Edition (2025) demonstrates convincingly that organizing business and technology for fast flow of value via empowered teams produces outsized results for enterprises worldwide. 11:45 Churchill (Ground Fl.) Session Blurring the Lines: Engineering & Data Teams in the Age of AI Lada Indra Head of Data Platform @Pleo, Previously Head of Data @Legend and Director API Platform BI & Data @Vonage Every senior engineer knows the feeling: a model makes a bad decision, a customer complains, and suddenly you're debugging a system that spans three teams, two pipelines, and a machine learning model nobody fully owns. Where do you even start? 13:35 Fleming (3rd Fl.) Session AI/ML The Ladder Is Missing Rungs: Engineering Progression When AI Ate the Middle Alasdair Allan Scientist, Author, Hacker, Maker, Journalist, CTO @Negroni Venture Studios, Interim CTO @Evaro Career progression in engineering has traditionally followed a predictable path: junior tasks teach fundamentals, mid-level work builds judgment, senior roles require synthesis across systems. 14:45 Whittle (3rd Fl.) Session AI Tools Rethinking Your Engineering Hiring Process & Signals for the AI Era Reece Nunn Software Engineering Manager @BBC AI has distorted the signals we rely on to hire engineers. CVs are increasingly tailored, screening can be rehearsed, tech tests can look “perfect,” and even system design and behavioural answers can be polished in ways that don’t reflect real on-the-job judgement. 15:55 Rutherford (4th Fl.) Unconference Unconference: Building Engineering Teams 17:05 Fleming (3rd Fl.) Session AI From Copilots to Orchestrators: A 12 Week Playbook for Training Engineering Teams Using AI Krys Flores Staff Software Engineer @Crunchyroll, Previously @Carta, @Lob, @Simple Habit, and @Nordstromrack.com|HauteLook Most engineering teams are stuck treating AI as autocomplete. Engineers have GitHub Copilot installed (or Claude or Cursor or whatever), they're generating snippets faster, but leaders can't connect usage to business outcomes—and developers are shipping code they don't fully understand.